“The struggle for Tamil rights and sovereignty is not a bargaining chip in an election but a fundamental issue of justice and human rights that cannot be compromised.”
Title: “US Tamils: A Call for Vigilance in the Upcoming Presidential Election Amid 76 Years of Broken Promises”
US Tamils urge Eelam Tamils, the global Tamil community, and their supporters to be careful about the upcoming presidential elections in Sri Lanka. The past 76 years have revealed a troubling reality: Sinhalese political leaders frequently fail to keep their promises, leading to continued genocide, suffering, and oppression for the Tamil people.
Over the years, several agreements have been made between Tamil leaders and the Sinhalese-dominated government of Sri Lanka. These agreements aimed to foster peace and address the genuine concerns of the Tamil people. They include:
- Bandaranaike-Chelvanayakam Pact (1957) – Aimed at establishing regional councils with substantial autonomy for Tamils, this agreement was unilaterally abrogated by the Sinhalese leadership, leading to increased tensions.
- Dudley-Chelvanayakam Pact (1965) – This pact sought to resolve the issues of language and regional autonomy for Tamils but was similarly disregarded, contributing to growing mistrust between the communities.
- Indo-Lanka Accord (1987) – Brokered by India, this accord promised devolution of power and the establishment of Provincial Councils. However, the implementation has been fraught with delays and obstacles, with successive governments failing to deliver on their commitments.
- Oslo Declaration (2002) – A ceasefire agreement and peace talks mediated by Norway were intended to lead to a permanent resolution. The process was abruptly abandoned, and hostilities resumed, culminating in the tragic events of 2009.
These agreements, among others, were seen as glimmers of hope by the Tamil people, only to be shattered by the actions of successive Sinhalese governments. The history of broken promises has left the Tamil community in a state of disillusionment, and with each election, the trust deficit widens.
As the presidential candidates make their rounds, offering new promises and assurances, we must remember the lessons of the past. We cannot afford to be swayed by empty rhetoric. The struggle for Tamil rights and sovereignty is not a bargaining chip in an election but a fundamental issue of justice and human rights that cannot be compromised.
Tamils have two choices. One is to boycott the Sri Lankan presidential election, which sends a clear message to the world that they do not support what is often called Sri Lankan Sinhalese democracy or ethnocracy.
The second option is to vote for a Tamil common candidate. This is only feasible if the candidate advocates for restoring the Tamil sovereignty lost in 1619 to the Portuguese. The candidate should clearly outline the approach he would take to achieve sovereignty or self-determination. If he calls for a Tamil referendum, the Eelam Tamils should back this candidate.
We advise the Tamils to be cautious and not be misled by Mr. Foxy Ranil, Mr. Navatkuli Viharai Man Sajitth, or any other Sinhalese politicians.
Let’s tell a story about how, even after the war, the Tamil people continue to stand strong in their fight for freedom. Their resilience shines through the challenges they face, showing their unyielding spirit and hope for a better future. Despite the struggles, they hold onto their culture, traditions, and dreams of a peaceful life. This story highlights their strength and determination in the fight for justice and independence.
Thank you,
Tamil Diaspora News
August 12, 2024
www.TamilDiasporaNews.com
